[Impact of a primary care pharmacy unit on the optimization of pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetic patients]. / Impacto de una unidad de farmacia de atención primaria en la optimización del tratamiento farmacológico de pacientes diabéticos tipo 2.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a pharmaceutical intervention on treatment optimization in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Before-after intervention study. SITE: Health centers of the Primary Care Department of Camp de Tarragona. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and under treatment with antidiabetic drugs. INTERVENTIONS: Review of pharmacological treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus and issuance of proposals for its adequacy. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and clinical variables were collected to assess the adequacy of antidiabetic treatment. A consensus meeting was arranged with the patients' primary care physician to evaluate the proposals for improvement. The implementation of the proposals and the variation in postintervention glycemic control were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 907 patients (59% men) were included. A total of 782 proposals for intervention were made in 65.8% of the patients reviewed. Of the proposals, 43.5% corresponded to drug discontinuation, 16% to intensification of dosing and 12.6% to exchange for a therapeutic equivalent. Of the consensual proposals, 54.7% were implemented. HbA1c was reduced by 0.2% after the intervention (7.4 vs 7.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Review of the pharmacological treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by a pharmacist or pharmacologist facilitates its optimization.

Design and validation of a predictive equation to estimate unbound valproic acid concentration.

OBJECTIVES: Total plasma levels of valproic acid (VPA) may mask an increased risk of adverse effects in hypoalbuminaemic patients since, in these patients, the free fraction is higher. The aim of this study is to analyse the relationship between plasma levels of total and free VPA (FVPA) in hypoalbuminaemic patients and define an equation that allows the estimation of FVPA concentration, as well as to validate the obtained equation. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study conducted between January 2015 and January 2020. Hypoalbuminaemic adult patients with normal renal function were included. Serum VPA levels were determined using an automated enzyme immunoassay technique with a pre-treatment of the sample by ultrafiltration for the quantification of FVPA. Patients' determinations were randomised into two groups: first, to calculate the FVPA estimation equation (regression group) by multiple linear regression analysis; and second to validate the equation (validation group), calculating the agreement between experimental and estimated FVPA concentrations using Lin's coefficient and a Bland and Altman analysis. RESULTS: We included 51 determinations, corresponding to 33 patients: 26 in the regression group, and 25 in the validation group. The multiple linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between FVPA concentration (Y), total VPA concentration (X1) and albumin level (X2), explained by the equation Y=11.882 + 0.216*X1-4.722*X2. Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.798 (p<0.001). Lin's coefficient was 0.82 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.92). The Bland and Altman analysis showed a bias of 0.32 mg/L, and the concordance limits were between -3.80 and 4.44. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated equation adequately predicts FVPA concentration, with a high degree of correlation between the variables. Despite Lin's coefficient outcome, Bland and Altman analysis showed a minimum bias that slightly underestimates FVPA concentration, positioning the calculated equation as a useful and validated estimation tool in hypoalbuminaemic patients with normal renal function.

Bacteriemia en pacientes con nutrición parenteral central: prevalencia, factores asociados y tratamiento / Catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients receiving central parenteral nutrition: prevalence, associated factors, and treatment

INTRODUCCIÓN: la infección relacionada con el catéter es una de las complicaciones del tratamiento con nutrición parenteral central (NPC) que generan una mayor morbimortalidad. OBJETIVOS: el objetivo principal fue analizar la prevalencia de la bacteriemia asociada al catéter en pacientes con nutrición parenteral central. Los objetivos secundarios fueron: a) evaluar si el tipo de catéter central, la duración de la nutrición parenteral central, el índice de masa corporal o la estancia en la unidad de cuidados intensivos son factores asociados al desarrollo de bacteriemia; b) analizar el manejo terapéutico de la infección. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se trata de un estudio observacional retrospectivo. Se incluyeron los pacientes que recibieron nutrición parenteral central tras una intervención quirúrgica entre julio de 2018 y marzo de 2019. La asociación de las variables con el desarrollo de la bacteriemia se analizó mediante regresión logística. RESULTADOS: el 7,3 % (IC 95 %: 3,9-13,3) (n = 9/123) de los pacientes desarrollaron bacteriemia relacionada con el catéter. El único factor asociado al desarrollo de la infección fue la duración de la nutrición parenteral central (OR = 1,12; IC 95 %: 1,05-1,20; p = 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: la prevalencia de la bacteriemia relacionada con el catéter en este estudio es baja. La duración del tratamiento con nutrición parenteral central parece estar relacionada con el desarrollo de la bacteriemia. Sin embargo, se necesitan más estudios para identificar factores de riesgo que permitan minimizar este tipo de complicaciones

BACKGROUND: catheter-related infection is one of the complications of central parenteral nutrition treatment with the highest morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: the primary endpoint of this study was to analyze the prevalence of bloodstream infection in patients with central parenteral nutrition. Secondary objectives included: a) an assessment of whether type of central catheter, duration of parenteral nutrition treatment, body mass index, or being admitted to the intensive care unit are factors associated with the development of bloodstream infection; b) an analysis of the therapeutic approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this was a retrospective observational study. All patients who received central parenteral nutrition after surgery between July 2018 and March 2019 were included. The association between the different variables and the development of bloodstream infection was analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS: the prevalence of bloodstream infection was 7.3 % (95 % CI: 3.9-13.3) (n = 9/123 patients). The duration of central parenteral nutrition was the only variable associated with the development of bloodstream infection (OR = 1.12; 95 % CI:1.05-1.20; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: the prevalence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in this study is low, and the duration of central parenteral nutrition seems to be related to its development. However, further studies are needed to identify risk factors that might help reduce this kind of complications

[Catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients receiving central parenteral nutrition: prevalence, associated factors, and treatment]. / Bacteriemia en pacientes con nutrición parenteral central: prevalencia, factores asociados y tratamiento.

INTRODUCTION: Background: catheter-related infection is one of the complications of central parenteral nutrition treatment with the highest morbidity and mortality. Objectives: the primary endpoint of this study was to analyze the prevalence of bloodstream infection in patients with central parenteral nutrition. Secondary objectives included: a) an assessment of whether type of central catheter, duration of parenteral nutrition treatment, body mass index, or being admitted to the intensive care unit are factors associated with the development of bloodstream infection; b) an analysis of the therapeutic approach. Methods: this was a retrospective observational study. All patients who received central parenteral nutrition after surgery between July 2018 and March 2019 were included. The association between the different variables and the development of bloodstream infection was analyzed by logistic regression. Results: the prevalence of bloodstream infection was 7.3 % (95 % CI: 3.9-13.3) (n = 9/123 patients). The duration of central parenteral nutrition was the only variable associated with the development of bloodstream infection (OR = 1.12; 95 % CI:1.05-1.20; p = 0.001). Conclusions: the prevalence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in this study is low, and the duration of central parenteral nutrition seems to be related to its development. However, further studies are needed to identify risk factors that might help reduce this kind of complications.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: la infección relacionada con el catéter es una de las complicaciones del tratamiento con nutrición parenteral central (NPC) que generan una mayor morbimortalidad. Objetivos: el objetivo principal fue analizar la prevalencia de la bacteriemia asociada al catéter en pacientes con nutrición parenteral central. Los objetivos secundarios fueron: a) evaluar si el tipo de catéter central, la duración de la nutrición parenteral central, el índice de masa corporal o la estancia en la unidad de cuidados intensivos son factores asociados al desarrollo de bacteriemia; b) analizar el manejo terapéutico de la infección. Material y métodos: se trata de un estudio observacional retrospectivo. Se incluyeron los pacientes que recibieron nutrición parenteral central tras una intervención quirúrgica entre julio de 2018 y marzo de 2019. La asociación de las variables con el desarrollo de la bacteriemia se analizó mediante regresión logística. Resultados: el 7,3 % (IC 95 %: 3,9-13,3) (n = 9/123) de los pacientes desarrollaron bacteriemia relacionada con el catéter. El único factor asociado al desarrollo de la infección fue la duración de la nutrición parenteral central (OR = 1,12; IC 95 %: 1,05-1,20; p = 0,001). Conclusiones: la prevalencia de la bacteriemia relacionada con el catéter en este estudio es baja. La duración del tratamiento con nutrición parenteral central parece estar relacionada con el desarrollo de la bacteriemia. Sin embargo, se necesitan más estudios para identificar factores de riesgo que permitan minimizar este tipo de complicaciones.